The first two were in the eighties and the missing shares approximately 2005
Many people affected by this have contacted my firm over the last weeks and months looking for help and an explanation – so the explanation follows; continued.... There are two regulations that govern US brokerage firms’ and banks’ reporting and due diligence responsibilities with respect to dealing with non-US residents: The “Know Your Customer“(KYC) rule and the new FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) regulations. Each of these regulations is intended to make financial institutions responsible for ensuring that their clients do not partake in money laundering or tax evasion activities.
If you have been affected by these events and need help, please get in touch.
When a recent action drives you nearly to suicide I think it is the time to tell the full story. It is the time of judgement. When you have sunk to such depths going through a divorce (many years ago) you can hopefully ride this experience out and expose financial entities for what they are.
I have a my court papers relating to my prosecution against the Midland Bank where the Deputy Governer of England became Chairman of the Midland Bank and a Bank of England regulation was back-dated to favor the bank regarding non-residents being able to obtain and overdraft if I remember correctly. This case took 20 years out of my life - obviously the court (Swindon) had to find in favor of the bank. But from the smile on the face of the judge he knew that morally I had a case and should have won.
My writings may take me a year and hopefully my followers will bear with me
Oct 6, 2015 - The largest 500 U.S. companies would owe an estimated $620 billion in ... Apple has consistently defended itself against claims of tax-dodging.
John Nichols v Midland Bank plc (Case number 8505099 Swindon) February 1997 no defence was on the Court file and Mr Nichols entered in default. To be fair to him and critical of the defendant he did it after an on notice hearing to which the Defendant failed to appear. Judgement was subsequently set aside and we got back to square 1. Significant things which have happened since are that Mr Nichols provided Further and Better Particular and the Defendant Bank has filed and amended defence, the original Defence merely stating the Statement of Claim discloses no cause of action. 5 August 1998. Note because it was a bank it is evident that the Judge allowed the Defendant to break the law
Why Is My US Brokerage Firm Closing My Account? https://t.co/xGMWlHUmhG via @sharethis
— john nichols (@jnichols_itc) December 19, 2015
in the informative article by Tom Zachystal, CFA, CFP. to read in fullMany people affected by this have contacted my firm over the last weeks and months looking for help and an explanation – so the explanation follows; continued.... There are two regulations that govern US brokerage firms’ and banks’ reporting and due diligence responsibilities with respect to dealing with non-US residents: The “Know Your Customer“(KYC) rule and the new FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) regulations. Each of these regulations is intended to make financial institutions responsible for ensuring that their clients do not partake in money laundering or tax evasion activities.
If you have been affected by these events and need help, please get in touch.
When a recent action drives you nearly to suicide I think it is the time to tell the full story. It is the time of judgement. When you have sunk to such depths going through a divorce (many years ago) you can hopefully ride this experience out and expose financial entities for what they are.
I have a my court papers relating to my prosecution against the Midland Bank where the Deputy Governer of England became Chairman of the Midland Bank and a Bank of England regulation was back-dated to favor the bank regarding non-residents being able to obtain and overdraft if I remember correctly. This case took 20 years out of my life - obviously the court (Swindon) had to find in favor of the bank. But from the smile on the face of the judge he knew that morally I had a case and should have won.
My writings may take me a year and hopefully my followers will bear with me
Top 500 US firms keep $2.1 trillion in tax havens, study finds
america.aljazeera.com/.../top-us-companies-keep-21-trillion-in-tax-haven...
#DFID PIDG trust administered by SG hambros, bank found by HMRC to have helped devise NT advisers' #taxavoidance schemes
— Margaret Hodge (@margarethodge) October 15, 2014
An Estepona Court accepts a criminal complaint against 2 directors of SG Hambros Gibraltar: http://t.co/xUjTY7ifgM #equityrelease #SGHambros
— ERVA- Equity Release (@erva_es) June 2, 2015
Is Osborne serious about big time tax cheats - or just the little guys? My column today:
https://t.co/Gorod0G4ZP
— Polly Toynbee (@pollytoynbee) December 17, 2015
From my point of view both the US & UK seem to be leaving the big players in peace
5 of the world's biggest banks paid no UK #corporationtax last year - report https://t.co/OR9rwd2BL8 #taxavoidance #CSR
— Edward Harkins (@EdwardHarkins) December 23, 2015
Without Prejudice - Midland case the judge gave me permission to publish on the internet John Nichols v Midland Bank plc (Case number 8505099 Swindon) February 1997 no defence was on the Court file and Mr Nichols entered in default. To be fair to him and critical of the defendant he did it after an on notice hearing to which the Defendant failed to appear. Judgement was subsequently set aside and we got back to square 1. Significant things which have happened since are that Mr Nichols provided Further and Better Particular and the Defendant Bank has filed and amended defence, the original Defence merely stating the Statement of Claim discloses no cause of action. 5 August 1998. Note because it was a bank it is evident that the Judge allowed the Defendant to break the law
